Juror13

True crime and trial opinions from a layman's perspective

Excerpt from FOOL’S PARADISE: The State vs Steven Avery

From the chapter The Key:

family

For most people telling a simple lie in a straightforward way is difficult.  We know the answer so when we consciously give an incorrect one there’s an internal disconnect, a mental jolt.  Bad liars don’t want to let on that they’re ‘jolting’ while they’re lying, hence the diarrhea.

The next question Alvear asks Avery is: “What sort of questions are police asking you?”

Avery: [glances away, blinks three times] “Jus when she was out here…what time…around…mmm…[shrugs]…zabout it.”[Nods reassuringly]

I doubt whether the police said to Avery: “Around what time was Teresa here?” 

2016-01-16 06.34.20

They would have wanted to know EXACTLY what time Teresa was there.  When she arrived and when she left.  Notice how vague Steven is in answering Alvear’s question again.  He basically tells one thing, that they want to know when she was there.  Didn’t they want to know where he was?  Where the car was?  When he called her?  Did he see anything suspicious?  How often had Teresa come out there?

Notice the contradictory body language again.  Shrugging and nodding.  The message is: I don’t know – yes that’s true, I don’t know.

Alvear asks Avery if the police asked him to take a polygraph.  It’s an interesting question, because if we think he’s lying, what does Alvear think?  What do the police think?

2016-01-16 03.35.39

Again, Avery’s response to this pointed question is like his first answer.  The simple answer is a straightforward yes or no.  But notice how Avery answers it.

Alvear: “Hmm. Did they ask you to take a polygraph or anything like that?”

Avery: “No…[shakes his head] no.  Well tonight…cops come, they ask me if I…remember anything…[scowls, shrugs]…I told them no. Oh…then they asked me if they can come in the house and check the house over. [Shrugs] I said I ain’t got no problem with that, come on in. [Small, quick nod] So they checked the house all over…[shrugs] ..uh, everything was fine and then they left.”

2016-01-16 02.30.50.png

It sounds perfectly harmless, doesn’t it?  I ain’t got no problem…everything was fine. Really? It’s strange that Avery says he doesn’t remember anything.  Does he mean he didn’t notice anything strange, or that he simply doesn’t remember anything? This guy’s really talking like a guilty sucker! Surely if he was innocent he’d remember a great deal and try to be helpful.  Surely if he was innocent he’d be both annoyed at being under suspicion and considerate towards the Halbach’s.  He could say: “We’ve actually been searching the property ourselves.  We’re joining the search.”  But of course if he knows Teresa’s dead, he knows searching for her is pointless.

Another problem with Avery’s answer is… 

FP cover as of 1.17.16

FOOL’S PARADISE is the first book in a 3 book series.  Get it on Amazon today.

If you don’t have a Kindle, you can download the free Kindle Reading App and read from your PC or smart device.

Join the conversation!  Leave your comments here or contact the authors on Twitter.

@HiRezLife

@lisawJ13

What’s everyone saying?

 

3 comments on “Excerpt from FOOL’S PARADISE: The State vs Steven Avery

  1. kat2up
    January 18, 2016

    I don’t think Steven Avery would answer in your perfect way. You must take into consideration his intelligence, his past 18 year confinement for a crime be did not commit and like a deer in the headlights that train is coming at him again. I don’t agree with your assessment. How many times and in how many ways did he profess his prior innocence to no avail for 18 long scrutiny years.?

    • juror13
      January 18, 2016

      Hi kat2up,
      It’s not so much about answering perfectly as it is answering sincerely. There are many red flags going off in that interview we are referencing in the excerpt. Just like everybody else, I’m pretty disgusted at how the police handled his case in 1985. However, it shouldn’t prevent one from examining the facts of the 2005 case in their entirety. The documentary MAM is not complete, not even close. What we’re trying to accomplish in our 3 book series is to tackle the case piece by piece – identifying the questions, the gaps, the inconsistencies, the biases, etc and then moving forwarding to interrogating the people and the trial. When you follow the path of each piece of evidence and ask the relevant questions, you may find yourself surprised at where you end up.

      • @kat2up when Avery was arrested for the Beerntsen case his response was: “Where does the bitch live.” When he was charged for the murder of Halbach another relative had brought a charge of sexual assault against him. Because they knew he was being tried for another crime, they dropped the charges. Steven also threatened to kill the relatives family if she breathed a word of it to anyone. This all happened in the summer of 2005, iow during his engagement to Jodi and prior to Halbach’s death.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on January 18, 2016 by in Steven Avery and tagged , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: