True crime and trial opinions from a layman's perspective
Did Oscar get away with it?
What were Oscar’s intentions?
Did the Court incorrectly apply the principles of dolus eventualis?
Available on Amazon this week… FUGITIVE
That Reeva screamed as loudly as she did and that this still wasn’t able to save her, even after death, is deeply unsettling isn’t it? Those screams have been silenced. Despite several witnesses coming forward, two at some risk to their own needs for privacy, despite these witnesses testifying to the same ‘bloodcurdling’ screams, the Judge decided to dismiss their seemingly inconsistent evidence. The Judge – a woman – also silenced those screams. Some of Oscar’s nearest neighbours claimed never to have heard a woman screaming in the first place. Oscar’s gardener, who lived on the premises, disappeared and apparently hasn’t been seen since. Did he hear anything? Would he tell anyone if he had?
In the seconds immediately following four deafening blasts, as her final shriek swam into the night and floated towards the concerned face of Dr Michelle Burger, Reeva must have felt a sense of drowning. Drowning in a toilet, dying in a man’s house, losing her precious blood and her precious life over cool, hard unfeeling bathroom tiles, Reeva was forced to leave a precious world just as she was starting to really enjoy it… It is in her excruciating desire to live that Lisa and I have found her voice, and in a sense, our own.
Share your thoughts with the authors on Twitter:
If you’d like to join the discussion on Whatsapp, sign up for our True Crime Crosshairs group by commenting on this post with your contact phone number. NOTE: Comments are private and moderated by J13. Phone numbers will remain confidential.