Oscar Trial – Day 15, March 25 – State Rests MOLLER, MARITZ, VERMEULEN

Moller is back on the stand. He is talking about Oscar’s phones.

Oscar’s phone number ending in 4949 is the one that was seized at the scene.

Oscar’s phone number ending in 0020 is the one that was turned in by the Defense on Feb 26, 2013. This is the one that was primarily used by Oscar on February 13 and 14.

Moller verifies he used XRY software to do the data extraction on the phone that was seized on the scene.

For the other phone that was turned in later, there were 3 types of extractions completed – one with Cellebrite software, one done by Apple in the US, and one completed on an updated version of the XRY software on March 5 of this year.

The paper and electronic downloads of these devices were given to the Defense.

The communication analysis that he did, based on the records provided from the service provider, not only included details about the communication but also about movement.

These phone records can show you phone calls, text messages and GPRS activity. GPRS is all of the internet activity (social media, WhatsApp chat, etc). The cell towers that were used for each action are noted on these phone records as well. This is how they are able to track movement.

Rather than bringing large paper reports to court to show what was found, Moller compiled all of the data in to charts so the information could be visualized. It is much easier to understand both content and movement when put in to chart format.

The first chart compiled was for Reeva’s communication and movement.

diagram of Reevas calls

The following is a list of her communications for February 13:

12:11:50 – GPRS connection – 17 seconds

13:02:52 – Incoming voice call from 4949 (Oscar) – 241 seconds – tower closest to Oscar’s house

13:07 to 13:40 – 4 more GPRS connections. The last internet connection lasted for 7,340 seconds (roughly 2 hours).

MTSMS – incoming text message from unknown number

15:41:54 – Incoming voice call from 4949 (Oscar) – 93 seconds – tower closest to Oscar’s house.

15:54:27 – Incoming voice call from 0020 (Oscar) – 113 seconds – tower closest to Oscar’s house.

17:12:57 – Incoming voice call from 0020 (Oscar) – 63 seconds – tower closest to Oscar’s house.

Some more GPRS activity

17:44:54 – Outgoing call to 0020 (Oscar) – 144 seconds – she had moved, different tower now.

For the remainder of the day there were only GPRS connections made by the device.

20:04:00 – GPRS – 17 seconds – tower closest to Oscar’s.

20:04:17 – The last GPRS of the day – 41,029 seconds (over 11 hours) – tower closest to Oscar’s.

Moller reminds the Judge that if she would like to see the content of those GPRS connections (potentially WhatsApp chats) she could look back at the data downloads that he provided yesterday to see what the specific content was for those times. Nel had Moller point this out right after he spoke about the GPRS that started at 20:04:00.

The next chart is for Oscar and it includes both of his phone numbers.

diagram of Oscars calls

They first look at the information for the 4949 device.

4949 Number

February 13

17:15 to midnight – only 5 GPRS connections made. No phone calls made.

February 14

Incoming text messages were received on this phone.

One incoming voice call was relayed to the voice mailbox center. The tower was listed as “no cell ID in ticket”. This means that the cell phone was switched off during that time and the messages would be delivered once the phone was turned on.

0020 Number

February 13

17:30:46 – GPRS – 254 seconds – Mitrand Gardens tower

As Oscar made more GPRS connections during this time frame, the towers indicated that he was moving closer towards his home.

17:44:54 – Incoming call from Reeva – 144 seconds – The Mint NGA tower

17:56:51 – Incoming call from 7775 – 307 seconds – Mustek George Rd tower

18:07:22 – Outgoing call to 5937 – 522 seconds – Volpatron CelC NGA tower

18:47:59 – Outgoing call to 7775 – 56 seconds – tower closest to Oscar’s

20:25:07 – Outgoing call to 3964 – 1,757 seconds – tower closest to Oscar’s. This was the last voice call made prior to the shooting.

4 GPRS connections made by the device for the remainder of the night.

February 14

01:48:48 – GPRS – 309 seconds – tower closest to Oscar’s (the remaining are all on the same tower as well)

03:18:45 – GPRS – 75 seconds

03:19:03 – Outgoing call to 2251 (Johan Stander) – 24 seconds

03:20:02 – GPRS – 79 seconds

03:20:05 – Outgoing call to 082911 (ambulance service) – 66 seconds

03:21:22 – GPRS – 61 seconds

03:21:33 – Outgoing call to 6797 (Baba, security) – 9 seconds

03:21:47 – Outgoing call to 121 (voicemail) – 7 seconds

03:22:05 – Incoming call from 6797 (Baba, security)

03:55:02 – Outgoing call to 8888 (Justin Devaris) – 123 seconds

Another GPRS for 83 seconds

04:01:38 – Outgoing call to 7775 (Deco – Heinrich Pistorius) – 54 seconds

2 more GPRS connections

04:09:03 – Outgoing call to 6940 (Peet Van Zyl) – 11 seconds

04:09:42 – Outgoing call to 6940 (Peet Van Zyl) – 13 seconds

04:10:21 – Outgoing call to 6940 (Peet Van Zyl) – 3 seconds

04:11:25 – Incoming call from 6940 (Peet Van Zyl) – 49 seconds

A few more GPRS connections

Then after this time, all incoming calls were diverted to the voice mailbox center. No outgoing calls were made.

The phone was pinging to the tower closest to Oscar’s up until 8:00am and then it left the location (meaning that somebody took it with them when they left Oscar’s house and it wasn’t the police)

That’s all for Nel. Roux is up to cross-examine.

Roux asks Moller how it would be possible for Reeva’s phone to still have active GPRS activity after her death. In particular the GPRS connection that started on Feb 13, at 20:04:17 (while she was alive) and lasted for 41,029 seconds (11+ hrs), ending after her death.

He explains that one of the applications on the device was still open and connected to the network. I wonder if we’ll find out more about this. This is where Moller reminded the Judge that she could go back to the data report and find out specifically what Reeva was doing on her phone at the time.

He testifies there are also other reasons why smart phones connect to GPRS networks such as email updates, automatic cell phone updates, etc. It doesn’t necessarily require human interaction to activate GPRS. From billing records alone, you cannot specify human interaction. (But again, you can also look back to the data reports to find out if there was human interaction.)

Roux then reviews the security call logs from February 14, 2013.
These are the calls that security guard Baba received:

Incoming call at 03:15:51 – 16 seconds (Stipp)

Incoming call at 03:16:15 – 0 seconds, not answered (Nhlengethwa)

Incoming call at 03:16:36 – 44 seconds (Nhlengethwa)

Incoming call at 03:21:33 – 9 seconds (Oscar)

Then Baba’s outgoing call to Oscar was after this and lasted for 12 seconds. This is the “everything is fine” call.

Incoming call at 03:27 – 0 seconds, not answered (Stipp)

Roux points out that Oscar called his voicemail in between the time that he called Baba at 3:21:33 and when Baba called back at 3:22:05. The voicemail call was at 03:21:47 and lasted 7 seconds. He asks Moller if he is aware that on iPhones the voicemail button at the bottom can easily be pushed by accident when trying to dial a number. Moller agrees that he has heard this. Roux suggests that Oscar did not intentionally call his voicemail at that time, it was an accident.

Roux then asks Moller if he knows who was using Oscar’s phone at the time the calls were made (and then answered) to Peet Van Zyl between 4:09:03 and 4:11:25. And he says no, he does not. It’s Oscar’s phone but he does not know who was using it at the time.

Roux focuses next on the text messages between Oscar and Reeva on WhatsApp. Out of the approximate 1,700 messages between them, only 4 were chosen to be read in court by the State. Roux wants to know why only these 5 were relevant.

Moller explains that he was looking for ones that stood out from their normal, ordinary conversations. Roux pointedly asks him if he was looking for arguments and he agrees he was. Moller clarifies that it wasn’t just 4 text messages it was 4 conversations (that lasted over several texts.)

Roux also wants to address the message that was read regarding the Tashas shooting incident. Roux asks Moller if he could find a message where Oscar says he asked Darren to take the blame for him. He says no he could not. The only message relating to that incident that they could find was the one read yesterday.

Roux now spends a lot of time going through the more loving messages exchanged between Oscar and Reeva. He also points out that some of the arguments that were noted yesterday were over somewhat quickly. This is evidenced by text messages the next day using words like baby and showing kiss symbols like XX.

For the record… listening to Roux read flirty text messages and say “kiss, kiss” repeatedly in court may require me to seek therapy at some point. 🙂

Reeva text pic

RS: You like it?
OP: I love it

RS: Morning Ozzy
OP: Morning Baba

He is also pointing out a number of other texts that relate to various aspects of the case:

On January 23, 2013, there was a text from Oscar to Reeva.
OP: I’m just in the physio baba

This pertains to Oscar needing therapy for an injured shoulder. This will be relevant to what side of the bed Oscar was sleeping on the night of the shooting.

Then another text message from Feb 11, 2013, there was another message about his shoulder.

OP: I’m not going, my shoulder is stuffed.

Roux also wants to show that Reeva had an interest in cars, along with Oscar. This is evidenced by her webpage browsing history.
They review a number of text messages between Oscar and Reeva discussing cars and sharing pictures. Extracted from Reeva’s emails, there was also content about motor vehicles.

I think this is important because when Nel was presenting the iPad evidence, one of the links that came up in Oscar’s browsing history had to do with cars. Oscar’s expression in the dock was very peculiar. Nel was very vague and Roux barely wanted to cross examine on this – his only question to the expert, Michael Sales, was whether or not he knew who was using the iPad at the time. Go back to my Day 13 blog to see the exchange I am referring to. I think we are going to hear more about this when Oscar is on the stand!

Some emails were also uncovered about Reeva looking at property and wanting to relocate.

They next look at CCTV footage from a local store taken on February 4, showing Oscar and Reeva together acting in a loving nature towards each other.

cctv of RS and OP in store

cctv of RS and OP in store 2

Then more flirty messages are read:

RS to OP: You are a very special person u deserve to be looked after

OP: Will you please let me know you are safe
RS: I’m home boo…

RS: Are you up and going boo?
RS: Good luck with everything today rock star
OP: My angel X
RS: Booooo X

OP: Can’t wait to see you. Would you like me to pick you up?
RS: I really can’t wait to see you boo.
RS: I would love that angel.

OP: Good luck for your meeting beautiful X
RS: Its just an appointment baba OK XX
RS: My angel, I just had a slice of fish, I’m not hungry, I’m falling asleep. Can’t wait to see you XX

RS: Can I wear my leopard dress boo? I wore it to two private functions only, nothing media related.
OP: I hope you enjoy tonight my angel, I’m thinking of you
OP: Yea, I love that and you look amazing in it.

OP: I’m going to turn in wish you were here. Please send me a message to let me know you’re safe.
RS: Ok angel, sweetest of dreams. I’ll message you when I get home XXX

OP: Good morning angel. I hope you slept well. Off to the gym X
RS: Good morning boo. I eventually did. Enjoy gym XXX

RS: Truth is I miss you
OP: I’m missing you so so much!!

RS: If you want to go chill with him that’s cool angel 
RS: I can come to you whenever
OP: No baba we want to chill with you, I miss you
RS: I miss you too bub

RS: Baby I love spending time with you and sleeping next to you. I just don’t ever want to cramp your style or not give you space if you need it. Promise me you will always let me know when you need some Oscar time.
OP: I love having you sleep next to me too baba. You never cramp my style. I have some work I need to get through tonight and have an early start. I promise baba and likewise XX

RS: I’m always on your side. I’m pro you and pro your career, but mostly pro us and the health of our relationship

RS: We are important to me

RS: Lots of hugs. I hope you have a super blessed day. I have said a small prayer for both of us XXX
OP: Thank you so much for being strong my angel. That message meant a lot to me. I am taking your advice. Just sent a host of emails and trying to take control of my admin. Miss you X

OP: Come visit me
RS: If I knew you were just chilling I would have gone to you hours ago

And now we are getting down to the last few days before the shooting.

February 11…

RS: Baby can I cook for you on Thursday? (this would have been Feb 14)
RS: What can you eat this week?
OP: I’d love that

OP: My angel, thinking of you XX
OP: I wish you were here cuddling me
OP: I miss you so
RS: I’m sorry I’m not there angel 
RS: I’ll be there in my heart and mind XXX

February 12…

RS: Seeee your woman told u that u looking good
OP: I’m missing her today, she makes my heart happy
RS: You make her everything happy

RS: I know Warren wanted to have coffee today so we could catch up and I can get my post, etc from him, but I can see him another day
OP: Yea I will baba, I have a dentist’s appt at 12:30. Maybe go see him and come through when you’re done. XXX
OP: I will do baba. The physio didn’t have needles so I’ll go back after the dentist.

February 13…

RS: Baba I hope you don’t mind but I came back to the house to work and do some washing. It will help me a lot to get stuff done and relieve some stress. I’ll go through to Jo’burg at like 3pm. XXX

RS: It’s a difficult thing to try to console you baba because it’s a shitty thing and you’re a nice guy. I guess these things happen and we can just hope they work out for the best. You are an amazing person with so many blessings and you are more than cared for. Your health and future monetary blessings far outweigh this hurdle I can promise you that 
OP: Thank you so much my angel you don’t have to. X Stay tonight if you would like.

OP: I’m just finishing off at Ryan(?)
RS: Thank you baba let me know if you’d like to spend time with him or Carl. I’m sure you maybe feel like some family tonight.

RS: Angel I’m going to go home at like 6pm. Please stay and do whatever it was you were gonna do

Some thoughts about February 13 and what was going on with these two. Oscar called Reeva around 1:02pm and they spoke for 4 minutes or so. She then sends the text message to him about trying to console him. Something obviously happened to him that day that he was upset about.

Then, she had GPRS activity from 13:07 to 13:40 with that last connection lasting for 2 hours. We don’t know who she was chatting/texting/communicating with during this GPRS session. Unfortunately, the records that Moller addressed in court for Oscar only started around 5pm that night, so I can’t match up his calls to hers from earlier in the day.

Around 3:30pm Oscar seems to be finishing up wherever he is. She suggests that he spend the night with family and then a little while after that states that she is going home around 6pm

The next call I can see is from Oscar who called her at 5:12pm and they talked for one minute. She was still at his house according to the tower. Remember she was planning to leave close to 6pm.

There was some GPRS activity after this, although no additional text messages were mentioned in testimony so not sure if there was any more text communication between the two.

Reeva then calls Oscar at 5:44pm and speaks to him for 2 and half minutes. Her phone is now pinging from a different tower which means she has left his home.

There are no more calls after this, only GPRS activity. Again, no text messages read in testimony so not sure if they are texting each other.

But she was seen coming back thru the Silver Woods security gate some time close to 6pm that night (seen by Baba and seen on CCTV pics) so something made her come back. Oscar arrived home approximately 10 minutes after her. It is not clear if he was expecting her or not based on their exchanges.

So this really has me thinking about how the evening started for them. She may have surprised him or maybe he convinced her to come back. We’ll have to wait and see.

Oscar says to her earlier in the day to stay tonight if she likes and her response was that she was going home at 6pm, please stay (where he was) and do whatever it was he was going to do.

Based on these messages, it sounds like she was not planning on spending the evening with him, sounds more like he wanted to spend it with her.

Yet, in his bail affidavit he stated that Reeva called him and suggested they have dinner at home and he agreed. Something is not matching up here.

Sooo… if there was some back and forth that night about whether or not she was going to stay, and he was already dealing with some bad news from earlier in the day, maybe things were tense. We saw a neatly packed bag on the sofa in his bedroom. And we saw jeans on the ground outside just below the bathroom window. Maybe he did throw those out the window in anger because she wanted to leave. No doubt these messages and times will be dug in to deeper during cross-examination with him.

Nel is back up and reminds the court that Moller has read all of the WhatsApp messages. We have just heard the Defense read a handful of loving messages but wants to know how many of the total messages are long messages saying how much they are in love with each other.

Moller’s response is that the majority of the communication is very short, one line messages. Boo, baby and angel were used a lot but there were no long messages discussing their relationship or how in love they were.

Nel also points out that in some of the exchanges that Roux had read, parts of the exchange were left out. They were not reading full conversations so it’s hard to get the full context of what each side meant with their responses.

Nel now wants to look at the long message where Reeva discusses her feelings (read in court yesterday) and brings to the court’s attention that after Reeva sent that email, Oscar responded back “baba”. So clearly that word baba was used quite frequently, whether mad or not. It doesn’t necessarily indicate love as Roux would like to show.

Moller is excused.

Next witness up is Warrant Officer Adriaan Maritz. He has 24 years of experience as a police officer.

Nel asks him if there is any record in the police system of Oscar having been a victim of crime. He answers no.

They then look at a map of the Silverlakes community. Nel wants to know the crime statistics for the last few years. The map shows January 2011 through April 2013.

map of silverlakes crime

diagram of local crime

Summary of incidents:
1 murder on Bushwillow
1 theft on Bushwillow
1 house robbery on Wildwood Way in 2011

Not exactly a neighborhood teeming with crime.

Roux gets up to cross-examine. He asks Maritz if his only source of crime information was the computer. Does he know about any crimes that have not been reported? He answers that he can only give crime information for what has been recorded in their system.

He also asks Maritz if he is aware that the police that arrived at Oscar’s on February 14, had just come from a house robbery elsewhere. Yes he is aware of that.

He also points out that just because someone may stay in a secured estate there is no guarantee that they will be secure against house robberies and other serious crime. Maritz agrees with this statement.

Roux then states that Mr. Pistorius has been a victim of crime on many occasions.

Nel counters and asks Maritz if Mr. Pistorius had reported these many crimes to police, would it have shown up in their system? Maritz answers that there is always the possibility that a name or ID number could be misspelled or typed in incorrectly, in which case they might not find it right away.

Nel then asks, if Mr. Pistorius gave you the date or other pertinent information about the crimes, could they find them that way, and Maritz says yes.

Maritz is excused.

Vermeulen (now known as bat man) is back on the stand as the last witness for the State. He was called back at the request of Roux.

Vermeulen explains that he came back to court on the morning of March 18, to look at the mark that the Defense wanted him to investigate. Vermeulen basically says he wasn’t shown specifically where this mark was and he didn’t see anything new that wasn’t there before. He states that nobody was there that morning to point out to him what they wanted done therefore he didn’t investigate anything new (much to the annoyance of the Defense).

He reiterates that when he did his investigation there were only two marks on the door that he could relate to the cricket bat, as stated in his affidavit.

The mark is then pointed out to Vermeulen by the Defense.

defense mark on door

Roux is now pressing him on why he didn’t spend more time trying to fit the cricket bat in to the other marks of the door. Vermeulen states that his job on this case was to determine if the cricket bat was used to break down the door so that is what he did. He identified the marks that would have broken the door.

Roux wants to know if the pictures that were taken during Vermeulen’s investigation show him trying to match the bat up to the mark in question, and Vermeulen states that there are not pictures of that.

Roux shows him pictures that illustrate he did actually try to fit the bat in to the additional mark that they are asking about. Vermeulen says he has not looked at his photos since his last testimony. After viewing them he says he honestly forgot about them but would still like to maintain that he could not match the bat with that mark.

defense mark on door 3

defense mark on door 2

The reason why this is important is because the State’s position is that Oscar was on his stumps when he hit the door with the bat, the Defense says he was on his prosthetics. This mark is higher up so both sides want their interpretation of it to be correct.

Roux is “putting it” to Vermeulen that the State specifically tried to hide these photos by not putting them in their album. Vermeulen’s position is that he went in to this investigation with no idea that the height of the person was of concern. He investigated with an open mind and this is what he found.

Vermeulen is excused.

Nel concludes “this is the State’s case”

Roux requests two days adjournment to prepare his witnesses. Court will resume on Friday.

UPDATE: The trial has been postponed due to one of the assessors falling ill. The trial will resume on Monday, April 7.

Oscar Trial – Day 14, March 24 ANNETTE STIPP, MOLLER

Annette Stipp is the next witness on the stand. She is the wife of Dr. Johan Stipp. She is an Occupational Therapist.

On the night of February 13, 2013, she was at home with her husband, three kids and domestic worker. They went to bed around 10-10:30pm.

That night she was slightly flu-ish so was awakened by coughing. She was contemplating whether or not to get up for some water. She looked over at the clock radio and it said 3:02am. Typically that clock is about 3-4 minutes fast. She decided she would get up for a drink and just as she was about to sit up, she heard what sounded like 3 gunshots. She asked her husband if he had heard that and he said yes. She asked him what it was and he said gunshots. She sat up on the edge of the bed and could see the lights on at the two houses that are in view from her bedroom window.

This is her view from her side of the bed – she is closest to the small balcony window which is seen here.

view outside window from Mrs Stipp side of bed

And Mr. Stipp would be on the other side of the bed – this is a view from his side (although the photographer is standing up while taking this)

bedroom with curtain held back

Her husband jumped out of bed to go to the balcony. While his wife was expressing to him that maybe he shouldn’t go out there, they heard the screams of a female. The whole sequence happened very rapidly. Shots, then immediate screams. They both went out on the small balcony to see where the screams were coming from but they couldn’t tell. They could only see the two houses with their lights on.

They then moved to the larger balcony, as there is a better view from there. The large balcony has a white circle around it. The small balcony is the one that is just above the garage.

large balcony from outside circled in white

The screaming continued for several minutes, it was constant. She described them as the terrified screams of a woman. Mrs. Stipp then stated at one point, it sounded as if the screaming was coming closer. She said to her husband “is there somebody coming down the street screaming?” But they didn’t see anybody. They were out on the balcony for several minutes trying to figure out what was going on and where it was coming from. Dr. Stipp stated “well there was a man moving in the house on the left hand side.” She said to her husband “it sounds to me like there’s a family murder.” He then said he was going over there to help because there could be children involved. Dr. Stipp went back inside.

He walked in and dialed 10111 and could not get through. Mrs. Stipp then decided that she should go inside and help to make calls since her husband was trying to get dressed and call at the same time. As she turned to go inside, she again looked at the clock radio and it said 3:17am (again, typically runs 3-4 minutes fast). At that moment, she then heard 3 more shots. Her husband then yelled at her to get away from the windows.

They quickly obtained another security number and called it. A very short period after that, security arrived at their house. Mrs. Stipp then moved over to the small balcony (which overlooks the driveway) and told them that theirs was not the house that the sounds were coming from. She told them the sounds were coming from the house with the lights on, on the left side. They must please phone police since they were unable to get through and there were already 6 shots fired. That’s when security left and headed to Oscar’s house.

The screaming they had heard earlier continued all the way up thru the very last shot. She testified that they also heard a man screaming. She stated to her husband “there is also now a man screaming.” She could not hear what he was screaming, she could not make out words, but it was a definite male voice. After the second set of shots, it just became quiet. She heard no more screaming, neither male nor female.

Nel asks her if she also saw the man walking in the house, just as her husband did, but she did not. She is aware that in her statement she originally said she did but after really thinking about it, she did not, so she had them change it.

Mrs. Stipp also stated the house that they saw to the right of Oscar’s from their bedroom balcony had all of their lights on in the top story of the home. The house on the left (Oscar’s) has two sets of windows (one is the toilet room window and the other is the larger bathroom window) and one of the windows was open.

Here is an aerial view of Oscar’s bathroom windows. The toilet room window is on the left (the smaller one). The bathroom window is on the right. The white circle indicates the portion of the window that was open.

outside bathroom windows white circle indicates open window

According to Mrs. Stipp, the light remained on the entire time.

On February 21st of this year, she and her husband woke up during the night from what sounded like people arguing. She asked her husband if he heard it and he said yes. She then said “there’s no way we are getting up this time, we’re staying where we are, they must sort it out.” Her dog started barking loudly then so they just closed their balcony doors and went back to bed.

The next morning their neighbors came over to see if they could hear the commotion the previous night and they said they could but they chose to ignore it. The neighbors then said that there were people in their garden on the grass. They pretty much realized at that time the sounds were likely sound testing being done in relation to the trial.

And then again, on March 17, just last week, they were awoken again in the middle of the night to screaming. They could tell it was a man who was screaming at a higher pitch and then again at a lower pitch. Mrs. Stipp was completely annoyed because it was again 3:30am in the morning. She said to her husband that she’s sure it’s sound testing again, so she went out on the balcony and saw 2 males standing in their garden. She made some comment to them and then went back in to the house. These screams that she heard were nothing like the screams she heard on the morning of February 14, 2013. During the original incident it was continuous screaming and it was absolutely female. This was not.

She states she does not know Mr. Pistorius, nor did she know that he lived in that home on the night of the shooting. When they first moved in to the estate, the estate agent had told them that Mr. Pistorius lived there but she wasn’t sure exactly which house. The house that the agent pointed out to them turned out to be a different house.

Dr. Stipp went to the Pistorius house that night and came back home around 4:20am. Mrs. Stipp asked him what had happened. He wasn’t very talkative and looked upset. He said it was a man that had killed his girlfriend. She asked him what he looked like and he said he was very muscular and had tattoos on his back. But he didn’t pay as much attention to the male as his main concern was the female.

They were not able to sleep at all that night. Then at about 4:40am, they received a call from Mr. Stander to make sure he had the right telephone number and to let Dr. Stipp know that he would be contacted by Oscar’s lawyer. At this time, they still had not put two and two together. They did not know it was Oscar Pistorius.

The next morning, Mrs. Stipp was chatting online on her WhatsApp chat group, discussing what their husbands or boyfriends had done for them for Valentine’s Day. Her response to the group was that they had a very crappy start to their day because their neighbor had killed his girlfriend.

Everybody responded saying that’s terrible. She wrote to them that the thing she’ll never forget was the terrible screaming.

They then got the children ready for school, her husband left for work and she opened the back door for her domestic worker at around 7:45am. The domestic worker asked Mrs. Stipp what happened the previous night. She had heard the noises. She is usually awake at around 3am and was talking to her husband when they heard a female start screaming. She at first thought it was a baby but then went outside and realized it was a woman. Mrs. Stipp relayed to her that there had been an incident across the road.

At around 8:15am, Mrs. Stipp received a call from her friend. The friend asked her if she had seen the news that morning and she replied no, she hadn’t. Her friend told her she was sure that the neighbor she was talking about was Oscar Pistorius. This is when she found out for the first time who lived in that house.

Since the time of the incident, two houses have been built on the lot in between Oscar’s house and theirs. This is important because any sound or sight testing that they are doing now would not match the conditions of the area on February 14, 2013.

You can see the lot as it was in February 2013, wide open.

aerial view of homes

Nel concludes verifying that Mrs. Stipp did not know the van der Mewres, Michelle Burger or Charl Johnson before this incident.

Oldwage (not Roux) gets up to cross examine. This guy makes Roux look like a teddy bear!


He wants to know how closely she has followed the coverage of this case in the media and if she has discussed it with her husband. She states that yes she has discussed it with her husband, naturally, and she said it’s impossible not to see it in the media because of the amount of coverage. But she has not sat down and watched it. Oldwage is proposing that her memory is somehow damaged by what she has heard by others. Clearly she must have been influenced. The defense uses this tactic on every single witness.

He then goes through her exact movements that morning. He also tries to evaluate her level of alertness from 3:02 to 3:17. She states it was the same throughout. He pesters her around and around what she and her husband discussed about this event, insinuating that they have colluded on their statements. She gave no indication that was the case.

He actually went so far as to ask her exactly how she was lying on the bed, if her feet were touching the ground when she sat up, etc. He’s just trying to trip her up on any detail to try to prove that she didn’t hear or see what she thought she did. She stands firm.

He then asks her if she heard muffled screaming when it first began and she said no, it was loud and clear screaming. I get where he is going with this. Reeva, presumably is in the toilet room at this time because the Defense maintains that the first round of shots heard are the shots that killed Reeva (right around 3am) and that she never screamed. The only person who screamed that night was Oscar. If it’s muffled screaming then maybe that would leave open the possibility that it’s Reeva screaming in the closed toilet room. But if it’s loud and clear screaming, then they propose it is Oscar who is in the main portion of the bathroom near the open window.

They then discuss when she sits up in bed, where exactly on the bed she is sitting. He says she is in the middle, she says no that she is a shorter person so she would typically be sitting higher up to the top of the bed when she sits on the edge. Now this is why it’s relevant. They examine a photograph that was taken in their bedroom. It is taken from the far side of the bed (the side that her husband sleeps on.)

bedroom with curtain held back

She sleeps on the side that is closest to the small balcony over the garage and when sitting down (not standing up as this photographer is), she has a clear view of the homes across the open lot.

Oldwage has an issue with the fact that the curtain is being held open by a hand. He states that it is to give a better view of the homes, which it is, but putting in to question whether or not she can actually see out this window which is a fair question.

But she points out that when that curtain is tied normally by a decorative rope and she is laying or sitting in bed on her side, she does have a direct view of the homes.

The argument went on for a while about the positioning of this curtain but whenever the Defense is this desperate to argue every minute detail, it tells me that they need this witness’s testimony to go away. It’s obviously very damning and the fact that she saw a light on at the same time that the female was screaming for almost 15 minutes, prior to the last round of shots, is obviously a huge problem for Oscar.

Oldwage made 2 or 3 different arguments during his cross examination with Mrs. Stipp that were stopped by the Judge. The Judge was seemingly very aggravated with him. At times he was badgering the witness and asking questions that were not appropriate for this portion of testimony. So she reprimanded him a few times. He definitely does not have the same finesse as Roux.

Nel wraps it up by showing this picture to Mrs. Stipp.

small balcony from outside

From this picture, you can see the lamp and the edge of the bed in the window. That is where her head would be. When the curtain is normally tied back with the decorative rope, which it was on the night in question, you can tell that she has clear sight out of that window.

Mrs. Stipp is excused.

Next witness up is Francois Moller. He is a Captain in the South African police service, stationed at the technology investigation support center for detective services. Colonel Michael Sales, who testified last week about the iPads, is his commanding officer.

He received 4 cell phones (2 iPhones, 2 Blackberries), 2 iPads and a MacBook computer from Hilton Botha (the original investigator) on February 15, 2013, all seized at the scene.

He explains in great detail the process that he took to identify which devices belonged to whom. Bear with me and pay attention because it gets a little technical here…

He removed the sim cards from the smart phone (iPhone) devices to ensure that there was no tampering or communication with any devices from the time he started his investigation to the time he finished.

With the sim cards out, there is no exact way to determine the phone numbers for the devices. So he started with the device that was marked as Oscar’s device, went in to his last contacts on the phone, and established the number for Reeva.

He then did the same to establish Oscar’s number, by looking at Reeva’s phone. He was under the impression that Oscar had only one phone.

He then applied for data records from the network service providers based on the phone numbers that had been allocated for each phone, per above.

From this, he was able to establish that the number he believed was for Oscar’s device was in fact not the right number. This device that was seized at the scene and marked as Oscar’s actually had a different phone number.

Meaning… there was another phone out there that Oscar was using (that Reeva had recently called) that had not been seized at the scene.

That phone was later turned in to the police by the Defense on February 26, 2013, after Oscar’s bail hearing.

It was established that the two Blackberries found on the scene were last used in late 2012, two to three months prior to the date of the incident.

Oscar had done a sim swap with the Blackberry service provider to get sim cards that would fit in to his new iPhones. He turned in the old larger sims from the Blackberries, got new smaller sims that would fit in the iPhones and was able to keep his same phone number and data. The new sim cards in the iPhones would have different serial numbers than the ones he originally had in his Blackberries.

Therefore, when Moller turned all of this information in to get reports, he received data records back for only 3 phone numbers. Those phone numbers were for Reeva’s one iPhone and Oscar’s two iPhones.

Are you still with me? 🙂

In addition to obtaining data records, he also did downloads/extractions of the devices via linking the devices with a computer, utilizing forensic software.

There are two types of data extractions. The first is “logical” extraction which is all of the data that the user can see on their device. For Reeva’s device, the logical extraction report was 2,600 pages.

The other type is called a “jail break”. With jail breaking you can install any 3rd party applications to the device, which they did, and receive even more data including deleted data. The print out from this extraction was over 35,000 pages.

The investigators then read through all of the chat messages on the phone, including text messages and messages from the WhatsApp app, which totaled 2,731 messages.

They did find messages that they felt were applicable to this case and they printed extractions from that to bring to court.

They were also able to pull off two email addresses for Reeva from her phone, one was a webmail account and the other was a gmail account.

Moller then proceeded to read through only the relevant messages, at Nel’s prompting, that gave a glimpse in to some potential relationship problems that Oscar and Reeva were having. Moller did make note that 90% of the communication between Oscar and Reeva was normal and loving. And the rest of it showed some potential issues.

The text messages read in court can be found here at this link:


Court adjourned for the day. Moller will be back on the stand tomorrow.